Topics

Featured articles

An engineering lead talking with three software engineers at their workstations during an informal stand-up
Blog

Dedicated Development Team vs Staff Augmentation: Which Model Fits

Staff augmentation means renting individual engineers who slot into your existing team and work under your management, billed by the hour or the day. A dedicated development team means a supplier assembles a self-contained unit, usually with its own team lead and project manager, and delivers against your requirements. They are genuinely different things, and the choice between them determines who carries delivery risk, where knowledge accumulates, and what you are left with when the engagement ends. There is a third option that most comparisons leave out, which is to employ the people yourself in a lower-cost location and direct them exactly as you would your own staff. That is the embedded model, and where it fits is set out below. Key takeaway The real question is not which model is cheaper per developer. It is who you want holding the knowledge of your codebase in two years' time. Staff augmentation leaves it with individuals who move on. A dedicated team leaves it with your supplier. An embedded team leaves it with you. A word on the numbers you will find Almost every comparison of these two models online is published by a company that sells one or both of them, including this one. When we looked for independent evidence on relative costs, break-even points and productivity, we could not find any: no analyst research, no academic study, no industry body data. What circulates instead are supplier figures, repeated between suppliers until they look like consensus. So treat the specific percentages you see elsewhere, and the ranges below, as indicative rather than established, and model your own numbers before committing. How each model actually works Staff augmentation. You identify a skills gap, a supplier provides engineers to fill it, and those engineers join your stand-ups, your sprint board and your review process. You set priorities, you manage them day to day, and you carry delivery accountability. The supplier's role is essentially sourcing and employment. Engagements are typically measured in months, and the people can be added or removed relatively quickly. Dedicated development team. The supplier assembles a unit, commonly a team lead, several engineers and a QA function, and that unit works on your product with the supplier managing it internally. You set the product direction; they organise how the work gets done. Engagements are longer, typically a year or more, and there is an onboarding period before the team becomes cohesive. The practical difference is management. With augmentation you do more managing and get more control. With a dedicated team you do less managing and get less visibility, and you pay for the management layer either way, whether in your own time or in the supplier's margin. Where staff augmentation is the right answer It genuinely suits some situations, and it is worth being clear about them rather than pretending otherwise. You have a strong engineering function and a specific, temporary gap: a migration, a compliance deadline, a specialism you need for one quarter. Your management capacity is not the constraint, so absorbing another few people into an existing structure costs you little. Or the work is genuinely finite, with a date on which it stops. In those cases paying a flexibility premium is rational, because you are actually using the flexibility. It stops being the right answer when the temporary gap turns out to be permanent, which is the commonest way companies end up overpaying. If you have renewed the same augmented engineers three times, you are not buying flexibility any more, you are buying a permanent team at a contractor rate. Where the model breaks down Knowledge leaves with people. Augmented engineers move between clients. Every departure takes context about your architecture, your quirks and your decisions, and every replacement needs onboarding you pay for twice: once in fees and once in your senior engineers' time. Management overhead is real but invisible. The hourly rate is easy to compare; the hours your engineering lead spends briefing, reviewing and coordinating are not on any invoice. In a small engineering function that time is the scarcest thing you have. With a dedicated team, the process knowledge accumulates at the supplier. That is comfortable while the relationship works. It becomes the whole problem when you want to change supplier or bring the work in house, which is the same dynamic we describe in our guide to BPO versus an embedded offshore team. Two legal points worth checking early Employment status. Where an engineer works through their own limited company and the relationship looks like employment, HMRC's off-payroll working rules can apply. For medium and large clients it is the client's responsibility to determine status and issue a status determination statement, and where the worker is deemed employed the deemed employer must account for income tax, employee and employer National Insurance and any Apprenticeship Levy. Long-running, full-time augmentation is exactly the pattern that attracts scrutiny. Data protection. If engineers outside the UK can access systems containing personal data, that is a restricted transfer under UK GDPR even when nothing is exported, and the ICO requires it to be covered by adequacy regulations, appropriate safeguards or an exception. Romania is covered by UK adequacy as an EEA member state; South Africa and India are not, so those need a safeguard such as the International Data Transfer Agreement plus a transfer risk assessment. Intellectual property In both models the intention is normally that everything produced belongs to you, but intention is not assignment. Check that your contract assigns IP rather than licensing it, that assignment is not conditional on something that might not happen cleanly, and that it flows through to the individual engineers rather than stopping at the supplier. Where people work through their own companies or through a chain of intermediaries, that chain needs to be complete, because a gap anywhere in it is a gap in your ownership. Where people are employed, IP in work created in the course of employment ordinarily vests in the employer, which makes the position simpler. This is worth a conversation with your own advisers rather than an assumption from an article. Three models, side by side Staff augmentation Dedicated team Embedded team Who directs the work You Supplier's lead You Who employs Supplier or intermediary Supplier Partner, dedicated to you Where knowledge sits With individuals With the supplier With your business Your management load High Low Moderate Typical duration Months A year or more Ongoing Best when A real gap with an end date You want delivery handled The capability is permanent How to decide One question settles most of it: is this capability temporary or permanent? If the work genuinely stops on a known date, augmentation is sensible and you should take the flexibility you are paying for. If you cannot name the date it stops, you are building a permanent function, and the model should reflect that. The second question is who you want to own the knowledge. If your codebase is the business, having its institutional memory sit inside a supplier is a strategic exposure, however good the relationship is today. And rather than borrowing anyone's break-even figures, build your own. Take a real role, put in the rate you are actually quoted, add your management time at a realistic hourly cost, add the replacement and re-onboarding cost you have genuinely incurred over the past two years, and compare it against a fully loaded employed cost in the location you are considering. That number will be more useful than any published comparison, including this one. Where Potentiam fits Potentiam builds embedded engineering teams for UK and European companies across South Africa, Romania, India and Brazil. The people are recruited to your specification and work only for you, in your repositories, your stand-ups and your review process, directed by your engineering leadership. We provide the office, the employment, the local management and the in-country HR support. It is not augmentation, because the people are not rotating between clients. It is not a dedicated team in the usual sense, because we do not manage the work or sit between you and your engineers. If you are weighing this against other routes, we compare them in our guides to recruitment agencies, freelance marketplaces, Employer of Record platforms and traditional outsourcing, and the embedded offshore team model explains how the approach works end to end. Frequently asked questions What is the difference between staff augmentation and a dedicated development team? With staff augmentation you rent individual engineers who join your existing team and work under your management, and you keep delivery accountability. With a dedicated development team, a supplier assembles a self-contained unit with its own lead and manages the work internally, delivering against your requirements. The trade is control against management effort: augmentation gives you more of both, a dedicated team gives you less of both. Which is cheaper? It depends on duration, and you should be sceptical of anyone who answers confidently. Augmentation usually looks cheaper at the start because you pay only for time used. Over a long engagement the flexibility premium, the management time and the cost of replacing people who move on all accumulate. We could find no independent research establishing where the crossover sits, so model it with your own rates and your own turnover experience. Does IR35 apply to augmented developers? It can. HMRC's off-payroll working rules apply where a worker provides services through their own intermediary and the relationship resembles employment. For medium and large clients, determining status and issuing a status determination statement is the client's responsibility, and where the worker is deemed employed the deemed employer accounts for income tax and National Insurance. Long-running full-time arrangements are the pattern most likely to attract attention, so take advice. Who owns the code? Normally you should, but check the contract assigns IP rather than licensing it, that assignment is unconditional, and that it flows through to the individual engineers and any intermediary companies. Where people are employed, IP created in the course of employment ordinarily vests in the employer, which is a simpler position. Take your own legal advice on the specifics. Can offshore engineers access our systems and data? Yes, with the right safeguards. Giving people outside the UK access to systems holding personal data is a restricted transfer under UK GDPR, which must be covered by adequacy regulations, appropriate safeguards or an exception. Romania is covered by UK adequacy; South Africa and India require a safeguard such as the International Data Transfer Agreement together with a transfer risk assessment. This applies whichever engagement model you choose.
Business professionals comparing insourcing and outsourcing strategies on a whiteboard with cost data
Featured

Insource vs Outsource: Which Is the Right Way to Scale Your Company?

## What Is the Real Difference Between Insourcing and Outsourcing? Insourcing means building your own in-house team to handle a function. Outsourcing means transferring that function entirely to a third-party vendor who manages people, delivery, and accountability. The choice determines your control, cost structure, scalability, and risk profile for the next 3-5 years. Key Takeaway Insourcing gives you control but saddles you with hiring burden and fixed costs. Outsourcing transfers risk to vendors but often sacrifices visibility and quality. A third path, strategic offshoring with embedded teams, combines the benefits of both. 12 weeks Average UK Time to Hire Up from 10 weeks in 2025 £2,710 Training Spend Per Person UK employer average (2024) 15% Employer National Insurance Threshold £5,000, frozen to April 2031 30–50% Cost Reduction, Embedded Teams Versus equivalent UK headcount Comparing a specific alternative? This page covers the overall decision. If you already know which option you are weighing up, these go into more detail on each one: * [Recruitment agency versus an embedded offshore team](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/recruitment-agency-vs-embedded-offshore-team) * [Employer of Record: costs, limits and when to use one](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/what-is-an-employer-of-record) * [BPO versus an embedded offshore team](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/bpo-vs-embedded-offshore-team) * [Offshoring, nearshoring and onshoring: where the team should sit](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/offshoring-vs-nearshoring-uk-guide) * [Freelance marketplaces versus a dedicated team for ongoing work](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/freelance-marketplaces-vs-embedded-offshore-team) And if your question is about a specific function or situation: * [Migrating an outsourced service desk to an embedded offshore team](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/migrating-outsourced-service-desk-offshore-team) * [Offshore Microsoft 365 and managed services teams for UK MSPs](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/offshore-m365-managed-services-teams-uk-msps) * [Offshore teams for professional services and consulting firms](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/offshore-teams-professional-services-consulting) * [Offshore finance and accounting teams for UK companies](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/offshore-finance-accounting-teams-uk) ## What Are the True Costs of Insourcing in the UK? A UK full-time employee earning £50,000 costs you at least £62,500 in fully loaded expenses when you factor in Employer National Insurance, pension, training, equipment, and workspace. Employer National Insurance stands at 15%, with the secondary threshold at £5,000 a year. The Budget extended the freeze on that threshold to April 2031, so the cost will not ease on its own. From 6 April 2026, Statutory Sick Pay is payable from the first full day of absence rather than the fourth, and the Lower Earnings Limit has been removed, so every employee now qualifies regardless of what they earn. Each change is modest in isolation. Together they raise the standing cost of every UK employee for the rest of the decade. (Sources: [HMRC rates and thresholds for employers 2026 to 2027](https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rates-and-thresholds-for-employers-2025-to-2026); [Employment Rights Act 2025](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2025/36).) The hiring process itself is broken. Totaljobs put the average UK time to hire at 12 weeks in its Spring 2026 Hiring Trends Update, up from 10 weeks in autumn 2025 and roughly five weeks two years earlier. The CIPD's Resourcing and Talent Planning survey puts the median cost per hire at £2,000 for senior managers and directors, and £1,500 for other employees. Neither figure counts the real expense, which is three months of output you did not get while the seat sat empty. Then add 6-7 months of onboarding before an employee delivers at full productivity. For a senior developer earning £55,000 to £65,000 in salary (outside London), your fully loaded cost sits around £95,000 per year. That's a fixed commitment for 12 months, with no flexibility if workload drops or priorities shift. Insourcing locks you into overhead. Management overhead adds another layer: plan 15-25% of manager time coordinating, mentoring, and supporting new hires, especially in the first 6 months. UK employers spend an average of £2,710 for every person they train, according to the Department for Education's Employer Skills Survey 2024. If you need to scale by 10 people, you're committing roughly £950,000 per year in fully loaded salaries plus 2-3 months of recruitment and onboarding friction. These are the kinds of [growth inhibitors](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/how-to-beat-the-5-biggest-company-growth-inhibitors-for-your-business) that stall mid-sized companies. ## Why Does Outsourcing Fail So Often? Outsourcing does not usually fail because the provider is incompetent. It fails because of how the arrangement is structured. You will find dramatic failure statistics quoted widely online, often attributed to Standish, Gartner or Deloitte, but most trace back to research about IT projects in general rather than outsourcing specifically, and the underlying reports sit behind paywalls where the numbers cannot be checked. The structural reasons are more useful than the statistics, and they are consistent. Providers optimise for margin, because that is what they exist to do. They price to win the work, then staff to the price. Communication runs through account management rather than directly between the people doing the work. Anything outside the statement of work becomes a chargeable change request, so teams stop asking and the service gradually drifts away from how your business actually operates. The pattern that matters most shows up at renewal. Once several years of process knowledge sits inside the provider rather than inside your business, leaving becomes expensive and staying becomes expensive too. That is the position many companies are in by the time they start looking seriously at the alternatives. Large IT projects run especially risky: 45% go over budget, 7% miss time targets, and 56% deliver less value than expected. You lose visibility into execution. You become dependent on a vendor's resource availability. If they lose a key person or shift focus to a bigger client, your project stalls. Hidden Costs of Traditional Outsourcing Vendor markup (typically 30-50%), rework budgets, coordination overhead, knowledge leakage, and the cost to insource the function after the outsourcing relationship fails. Budget 40% more than the vendor's quoted rate. ## Is There a Third Option Beyond Insourcing and Outsourcing? Yes. Strategic offshoring with embedded teams is the hybrid model that captures the benefits of both approaches while sidestepping their pitfalls. Instead of hiring in the UK or outsourcing to a vendor, you build your own team in a lower-cost hub like South Africa, Romania, or India. They work directly for you, report to your managers, use your systems, and operate as a true extension of your in-house team. Potentiam pioneered this model after our founders scaled EnergyQuote to 300+ employees, with 60% of the team offshore across South Africa and Romania. The company [exited to Accenture in 2015](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/how-a-ceo-delivered-21m-of-value-and-an-exit-to-accenture-by-building-offshore-teams-part-1-of-6) specifically because the embedded offshore team model worked at scale. No vendor markup. No rework cycles. No communication barriers. Just your team, working in your time zone, accountable to your KPIs. The embedded team model removes the vendor incentive misalignment. Your offshore team lives or dies by your success. You pay a fraction of UK salary costs (30-60% less, depending on role and location) but retain full hiring authority, performance management, and operational control. You own the relationship. You decide promotions, raises, and tenure. This is different from outsourcing. You're not buying a service contract with a vendor. You're building a function with a strategic partner who handles recruitment, onboarding, compliance, and [HR administration across four global hubs](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/benefits-of-using-managed-services-for-building-an-offshore-team). Potentiam's role is to find, vet, onboard, and support the people. Your role is to manage, develop, and retain them. Traditional Outsourcing You contract a vendor who hires and manages staff. No visibility into recruitment. Vendor controls resourcing and quality. Change requests trigger scope negotiation and cost overruns. High vendor markup, limited accountability, easy exit but difficult transition. Strategic Offshoring (Embedded Teams) You own a team based offshore with a partner handling logistics. Full hiring visibility and authority. You manage directly. Changes are implemented without scope renegotiation. No vendor margin. Deep accountability. Higher retention and knowledge retention. Discover how Potentiam builds [embedded offshore teams](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions) across four global hubs with dedicated HR support and a proven scaling playbook. [Explore Our Solutions](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions) ## How Much Does Offshoring Actually Save Compared to UK Hiring? The maths are stark. A senior developer in the UK costs £95,000 fully loaded. The equivalent professional in South Africa runs £38,000-48,000. Romania sits at £35,000-45,000. India ranges £20,000-28,000. You're not sacrificing capability; you're paying market rates for markets with lower cost of living. | Role | UK Cost | South Africa | Romania | India | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Senior Developer** | £95,000 | £42,000 | £40,000 | £24,000 | | **Finance Manager** | £58,000 | £28,000 | £26,000 | £15,000 | | **Data Analyst** | £48,000 | £22,000 | £21,000 | £12,000 | | **Customer Success Lead** | £42,000 | £19,000 | £18,000 | £10,000 | | **Marketing Specialist** | £38,000 | £16,000 | £15,000 | £9,000 | These aren't junior roles at junior rates. These are experienced professionals with 5-10 years of track record. The salary difference reflects cost of living, not capability. A senior developer in Cape Town uses the same tech stack, speaks English as a first language, and shares a similar business culture to the UK. A Romanian accountant is EU-trained and understands British tax law and compliance frameworks. An Indian data engineer has worked on multinational projects for years. For a 10-person team mix, shifting from full UK hiring to embedded offshoring saves £400,000-£600,000 per year in salary alone. Add in the avoided Employer NI changes, recruitment overhead, and onboarding friction, and the annual savings exceed £500,000 for that scale. ## What Functions Work Best for Offshoring? Not every role suits offshoring. Roles that require client-facing presence, deep cultural context, or real-time coordination with co-located teams face friction offshore. But the majority of knowledge-work functions thrive with embedded offshore teams. Technology roles are the fastest win. Software developers, QA engineers, data engineers, DevOps specialists, and tech architects [offshore seamlessly](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/building-a-world-class-technology-team-the-offshoring-vs-outsourcing) because code doesn't require physical presence and technical communication is remote-first by default. The best tech talent is already globally distributed. Finance and accounting benefit massively from offshoring. Bookkeepers, accountants, financial analysts, and payroll specialists in South Africa, Romania, or India handle UK-standard compliance, tax, and reporting with fewer errors and at 50-60% of UK cost. Time zone overlap actually helps; they complete overnight what a UK team might batch in a week. Data analytics, business intelligence, and data science teams operate fully remote-capable. The analysts you build offshore deliver reports, dashboards, and predictive models that inform strategy without requiring daily standup presence. Customer success and [offshore sales teams](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/a-revenue-acceleration-engine-why-offshore-sales-teams-make-more-sense) embedded offshore deliver high-touch support with English-first communication and cultural affinity. South Africa's talent pool particularly excels here; they've developed strong customer-centric cultures and sales support acumen. Marketing specialists, content creators, SEO specialists, and demand generation roles work well offshore when supported by clear briefs and brand guidelines. Potentiam's multi-hub network supports all four functions across [technology](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/technology), [finance](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/finance-accounting), customer success, and marketing leadership. ## How Do You Avoid the Common Pitfalls of Offshore Teams? The biggest risk with offshore teams is isolation. People shipped offshore without proper structure, governance, or support become disengaged, confused, and likely to leave within 12-18 months. Attrition rates in India hit 17-25% annually. You lose knowledge. You restart hiring. Savings evaporate. Success requires discipline in four areas: governance, communication, professional development, and HR support. Governance means clear processes. Your offshore team needs explicit documentation on how work is requested, reviewed, prioritised, and delivered. Async-first communication (Slack, Jira, email) replaces standup culture because time zones make synchronous meetings exhausting. Create decision frameworks so your offshore team can move without waiting 8-12 hours for a UK manager to respond. Communication requires over-communication. Record decisions. Write down context. Share quarterly strategy updates. Schedule monthly all-hands calls (even if ungodly hours for someone). The cost of miscommunication offshore is 10x the cost of over-communicating. Potentiam supports this with an embedded HRBP (Human Resources Business Partner) who works within your team structure, translating strategy and ensuring clarity across hubs. Professional development keeps people. Budget training, certifications, and clear promotion paths. Offshore talent want the same career growth as UK employees. If they feel stuck in a junior role forever, they'll leave. Invest in their growth and they'll deliver for years. Key Takeaway Embedded offshore teams fail when companies treat them as cost-cutting outsourcees rather than core team members. Success requires governance structure, intentional communication, professional development investment, and dedicated HR support to bridge geography and culture. 1 Define Governance Upfront Document how requests flow, decisions are made, and accountability is tracked. Async-first communication beats synchronous meetings across time zones. 2 Establish an Embedded HR Partner A dedicated HR support person embedded in your offshore hub bridges culture gaps, handles performance management, and surfaces issues before they escalate. 3 Invest in Onboarding and Training Spend 6-8 weeks on structured onboarding. Budget for certifications, tools access, and knowledge sharing. People who feel invested in stay longer. 4 Communicate Constantly and Over-Communicate Write down strategy, decisions, and context. Schedule monthly all-hands. Record updates. Clarity prevents confusion across distance. ## What Role Does AI Play in the Insource vs Outsource Decision? AI is reshaping the insource vs outsource equation fundamentally. Junior roles are disappearing. AI handles routine coding, basic data analysis, content drafts, and first-pass customer support. You need fewer junior people and more experienced ones to review, refine, and lead. This changes hiring incentives. Instead of building 10-person junior-heavy teams, you might build 6-person senior-heavy teams augmented with AI tooling. The fully loaded UK cost of a senior developer (£95,000) now buys you the equivalent of 1.5-2 junior developers (£60,000 each) plus AI tools plus improved quality through seniority. This makes offshore hiring even more attractive. A senior developer in South Africa at £42,000 plus AI tooling outpaces a UK junior at £45,000. You get experience, better code quality, and mentorship capability from day one. The outsourcing model fails even more here because vendors can't compete on quality when quality increasingly depends on seniority and AI augmentation. Strategic offshoring with smaller, more experienced teams is becoming the default for growth-focused companies. You scale senior talent offshore at 50-60% UK cost, augment them with AI tools your vendors likely can't afford, and end up with a more capable team than you'd build with in-house juniors. ## How Do You Choose the Right Scaling Model for Your Business? The decision matrix comes down to four questions: How fast do you need to scale? How much control do you need? What functions are you scaling? What's your tolerance for operational complexity? **Choose insourcing if:** You're scaling one or two functions that are mission-critical to product. You have strong hiring and people development capabilities. You can afford 8-12 weeks per hire plus 6-7 months onboarding. Control and culture fit are non-negotiable. **Choose outsourcing only if:** You need a non-core function handled (catering, facilities, low-skill admin). You're willing to accept lower quality and longer timelines. You have extensive vendor management bandwidth. You expect the engagement to end within 2-3 years. If those conditions don't match, outsourcing will disappoint you. **Choose strategic offshoring if:** You need to scale fast (6-12 months). You have 3-5 functions to staff simultaneously. You want direct hiring authority and management control. You're comfortable with some operational complexity (time zones, documentation, HR support). You need sustainable cost reduction (not short-term vendor discounts). You plan to retain the team 3+ years. | Criteria | Insourcing (UK) | Outsourcing | Strategic Offshoring | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Cost per Person/Year** | £95,000 | £80,000 | £42,000 | | **Time to Productivity** | 6-7 months | Vendor dependent | 8-12 weeks | | **Control and Flexibility** | 100% | Low | High | | **Quality Risk** | Low (your culture) | High (vendor incentive) | Medium (requires governance) | | **Scalability (10+ people)** | Slow | Medium | Fast | | **Operational Overhead** | High (recruitment, HR) | Medium (vendor mgmt) | Medium (governance, zones) | | **Knowledge Retention** | High | Low (vendor dependency) | High (you own talent) | | **Regulatory/Compliance** | UK standard | Vendor managed | Partner managed | ## Why Are UK Companies Choosing Strategic Offshoring in 2026? The trend is unmistakable. The global business process outsourcing market was worth around $328 billion in 2025 and is forecast to grow at close to 10% a year, reaching roughly $696 billion by 2033. Demand is not softening. For most UK businesses the question is no longer whether to use offshore capability, but how to structure it so that it behaves like a team rather than a supplier. (Source: [Grand View Research, 2025](https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/business-process-outsourcing-bpo-market).) But this growth isn't flowing to traditional outsourcing vendors. Companies are tired of vendor failure. They're building embedded teams instead. The Employer NI changes in April 2025 accelerated the shift; hiring in the UK just became 20-30% more expensive overnight. Potentiam's multi-hub model positions UK companies to tap four talent pools simultaneously. [South Africa](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/south-africa) offers English-first communication, strong customer success talent, and a growing tech ecosystem. You're hiring in a country where English is the business language and cultural affinity is high. The time zone (GMT+2) provides only 2-4 hours offset, so daily overlap is natural. [Romania](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/romania) provides EU-trained talent with compliance expertise, especially in finance and data privacy. Developers, accountants, and engineers with EU education and GDPR knowledge. Close enough to UK time zones for synchronous work. [India](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/india) delivers technical excellence and scale. You can build 50-person tech teams in Bangalore at costs impossible in the UK. Attrition and communication require discipline, but the technical talent density is unmatched globally. Brazil is emerging as a fourth hub, particularly for customer-facing roles. Portuguese and Spanish speakers with strong service culture, ideal for US/LATAM expansion as well as UK operations. The multi-hub approach is the key differentiator. Companies that build in one hub take all the currency and concentration risk. Companies that build across hubs reduce risk, improve time zone coverage, and develop operational resilience. Potentiam's proven playbook comes from scaling across four hubs simultaneously, learning what works and what doesn't. This is how serious companies scale in 2025. Not by hiring 20 UK junior developers at £900,000 annual cost with 6-month wait times. By hiring 15 senior developers across four hubs at £550,000 annual cost with 8-10 week speed to market. Better talent, lower cost, lower risk, faster execution. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### What is the difference between insourcing and outsourcing? Insourcing means building your own in-house team to handle work. You hire employees directly, manage them, and own accountability. Outsourcing transfers that responsibility to a vendor who manages staff, delivery, and timelines on your behalf. Insourcing gives you control but saddles you with recruiting overhead and fixed payroll. Outsourcing reduces management burden but transfers risk and often sacrifices quality. ### How much money can you save by offshoring instead of hiring in the UK? A senior developer in the UK costs roughly £95,000 fully loaded. The same role in South Africa costs £42,000-£48,000. Romania runs £40,000-£45,000. India ranges £20,000-£28,000. For a 10-person team, shifting from UK hiring to strategic offshoring saves £400,000-£600,000 per year in direct salary. Add avoided Employer NI, recruitment overhead, and onboarding friction, and total savings exceed £500,000 annually at that scale. The savings compound over 3-5 years. ### What are the biggest risks of outsourcing for SMEs? The dramatic outsourcing failure rates quoted widely online are unreliable, as most trace back to research on IT projects in general rather than outsourcing specifically. The risks that do show up consistently are vendor corner-cutting to protect margin, communication breakdown across time zones, scope creep producing hidden costs, rework caused by quality issues, and loss of visibility into how work is actually being executed. For SMEs with limited vendor management bandwidth, these risks are acute. The best path for SMEs is strategic offshoring with dedicated HR support, not traditional outsourcing to large vendors. ### How long does it take to build an offshore team? With a strategic partner like Potentiam, the timeline is 8-10 weeks from job posting to productive employee. This includes recruitment (3-4 weeks), offer and onboarding logistics (1-2 weeks), and initial training (3-4 weeks). Compare this to UK hiring, which Totaljobs put at an average of 12 weeks in its Spring 2026 Hiring Trends Update, before any onboarding time. Offshore teams with proper partner support reach productivity 4-5 months faster than UK hires. ### Can you offshore software development without losing quality? Yes, if you hire experienced people and invest in governance. Quality problems in offshore development are usually a function of seniority and process rather than location: teams staffed with juniors, working from thin specifications, without code review or clear standards, produce weak results anywhere in the world. Hire senior, document properly, review consistently, and quality tracks the team rather than the time zone. ### What is the best country for offshoring from the UK? The answer depends on your function. South Africa excels for customer success, sales support, and tech talent with English-first communication. Romania suits finance, compliance, and EU-regulated roles because of EU training and GDPR expertise. India wins on tech scale and cost, though communication requires discipline. The strongest approach is multi-hub: hire core senior roles in South Africa or Romania, scale tech or customer support in India, and maintain UK presence for senior leadership and client-facing strategy. Potentiam operates across all four hubs precisely because different functions thrive in different places. ### How much has the Employment Rights Act 2025 added to the cost of a UK hire? The Act removes the three day waiting period for Statutory Sick Pay and abolishes the Lower Earnings Limit from 6 April 2026, so every employee qualifies from their first day of absence regardless of earnings. SSP is paid at 80% of average weekly earnings or £123.25 a week, whichever is lower. Combined with Employer National Insurance at 15% on earnings above £5,000, a threshold frozen until April 2031, the fixed cost of a UK employee has risen materially and will not fall back. ### Is outsourcing still growing in 2026? Yes. The global business process outsourcing market was worth around $328 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach roughly $696 billion by 2033, a compound growth rate close to 10% a year (Grand View Research). The direction of travel among UK mid-sized businesses is towards embedded offshore teams rather than transactional outsourcing, because the cost saving alone no longer differentiates one provider from another. Ready to Scale Without the Hiring Headaches? Potentiam helps mid-sized companies build embedded offshore teams across South Africa, Romania, India, and Brazil, with strategic consulting, dedicated HR, and a proven playbook from operators who scaled to 300+ employees before exit to Accenture. [Book a Discovery Call](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/contact-us) [See Our Solutions →](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions)
A finance manager reviewing printed financial schedules at her desk in a bright modern office
Blog

Offshore Finance and Accounting Teams for UK Companies

An offshore finance team is a group of qualified finance people employed to work only for your business from a lower-cost location, inside your accounting systems and your controls, reporting to your Finance Director. Used properly it does not replace your finance function. It absorbs the transactional load underneath it, so the qualified people you already employ can spend their time on analysis, planning and the conversations that actually change decisions. Most mid-market finance functions have the same complaint: too much of the month is spent processing and closing, too little on forecasting and business partnering. That is a capacity problem, and UK hiring has become an expensive way to solve it. Key takeaway The design principle is simple: processing can move, authorisation cannot. An offshore team can prepare, reconcile, chase and post. Payment release, approval and sign-off stay with named people onshore. Get that boundary right and the control environment is stronger than most in-house teams manage, because the segregation is explicit rather than assumed. The cost of a UK finance hire has moved Two changes took effect in April 2025 that made every UK employee more expensive, and they hit transactional roles hardest in proportional terms. According to HMRC's published rates, the employer National Insurance rate above the secondary threshold rose from 13.8 per cent to 15 per cent, and the secondary threshold itself fell from £175 a week to £96, which is roughly £9,100 down to £4,992 a year. Employers now start paying National Insurance far earlier and at a higher rate. The effect on a finance team is straightforward arithmetic. Salary Employer NIC now Under the old rate Annual increase £28,000 (AP or AR clerk) £3,451 £2,608 £843 £35,000 (bookkeeper) £4,501 £3,574 £927 £45,000 (management accountant) £6,001 £4,954 £1,047 £60,000 (finance manager) £8,251 £7,024 £1,227 Calculated from HMRC published rates and thresholds. Excludes pension, apprenticeship levy and other benefits. Add minimum auto-enrolment pension and the fully loaded cost of a £28,000 clerk is over £32,000, and a £60,000 finance manager is over £70,000, before recruitment fees, equipment, workspace or the management time to supervise them. For a five-person transactional team, the National Insurance change alone added several thousand pounds a year for no additional capacity. This is why the offshore question keeps reaching finance directors. The work has not become less necessary; it has become more expensive to do in the UK. Which finance work moves The test is whether the task follows documented rules with a verifiable output, or requires judgement, negotiation or a relationship. Moves well Stays onshore Accounts payable processing and supplier statement reconciliation Payment authorisation and release Sales invoicing, allocations and routine credit control chasing Difficult debtor conversations and credit limit decisions Bank and balance sheet reconciliations Sign-off on reconciling items and write-offs Expenses processing and policy checking Exception approval and policy setting Payroll preparation and data assembly Payroll approval and submission Month-end schedules, accruals and prepayments preparation Judgemental provisions and close review Management accounts production and variance schedules Commentary, interpretation and board presentation Audit sample pulling and evidence packs Auditor negotiation and technical positions Model maintenance and scenario runs to a defined spec Setting assumptions and owning the forecast Note the pattern in the right-hand column: almost everything that stays is either an approval or an opinion. That is not a coincidence, and it is the basis of the control model. Controls: the part your auditor will ask about Payment release stays onshore. Always. The offshore team can set up suppliers, process invoices, match to purchase orders and prepare the payment run. A named person in the UK reviews and releases it. This single boundary addresses the fraud risk that finance directors are right to worry about, because the person who can create a supplier cannot also pay one. Segregation of duties becomes explicit. In a small UK finance team, one person often raises, posts and reconciles because there is nobody else, and everyone knows it is a weakness. Splitting the function across locations forces you to write down who does what and enforce it in system permissions. Many companies end up with better segregation after moving work offshore than they had before, which is worth saying plainly to a sceptical board. System access follows least privilege. Offshore team members get the permissions their role requires in your accounting system, and no more. Approval limits, supplier amendment rights and payment functions are configured deliberately rather than inherited. Every action carries a user stamp, so the audit trail is complete. Expect the auditor to test it. External auditors will want to understand where processing happens, who has access to what, and how approvals are evidenced. This is normal and answerable. Prepare a clear process map and access matrix before the first audit rather than during it, and expect questions about information security certification such as ISO 27001 from larger clients and lenders too. Payroll and customer data need particular care Finance data is personal data. Payroll contains names, addresses, bank details, National Insurance numbers and salaries; the sales ledger contains customer contact and payment behaviour. Giving a team outside the UK access to it is a restricted transfer under UK GDPR, even when the data never leaves your systems, and the ICO requires every restricted transfer to be covered by adequacy regulations, appropriate safeguards or an exception. Romania, as an EEA member state, is covered by UK adequacy, so information can flow without additional transfer safeguards. South Africa and India are not, and require a safeguard such as the International Data Transfer Agreement together with a transfer risk assessment. If your offshore team will handle payroll, this may reasonably influence which hub you choose. Separately, check your HMRC record-keeping obligations: records must remain accessible and produceable on request, which is a systems question rather than a geography question for most cloud accounting setups, but confirm your own position. A sensible sequence Start with accounts payable. It is high volume, highly documentable, has an unambiguous quality measure, and is usually the process your team most resents. Prove the model there for a quarter, then extend into reconciliations and sales ledger, then into month-end preparation. Statutory accounts support and FP&A modelling come last, once the team knows your business well enough for their output to be trusted without line-by-line checking. Document the processes before you transfer them, not afterwards. A process that only exists in a long-serving clerk's head cannot be moved anywhere, and writing it down is valuable whether or not you proceed. Then run parallel for a cycle so you can compare output before you rely on it. Measure the right outcome. The point is not offshore headcount cost. It is whether your qualified UK people are now spending their time on analysis and planning rather than processing, and whether close is faster and cleaner. If your management accountant is still doing reconciliations three months in, the transfer has not really happened. Where Potentiam fits Potentiam builds embedded finance teams for UK companies across South Africa, Romania, India and Brazil. We recruit to your specification, provide the office, local management and in-country HR, and the team works inside your accounting systems to your controls. You keep authorisation, approval and professional judgement, as you must. Romania is a common choice for finance work: EU-trained accountants, strong English, and the adequacy position that simplifies payroll and personal data handling. South Africa suits teams needing close collaboration during UK hours. We compare the options in our guide to offshoring, nearshoring and onshoring, and the embedded offshore team model explains how the approach works. Our RedFin case study shows an offshore finance team in Romania in practice. Frequently asked questions Is it safe to have an offshore team process our payments? Yes, provided authorisation stays onshore. The offshore team prepares the payment run: supplier setup, invoice processing, purchase order matching, reconciliation. A named person in the UK reviews and releases it. This maintains segregation of duties, and because it is designed deliberately it is often stronger than the arrangement in a small in-house team where one person does everything. How much has a UK finance hire actually gone up? From April 2025 the employer National Insurance rate rose from 13.8 to 15 per cent and the secondary threshold fell from about £9,100 to about £4,992 a year, per HMRC's published rates. In practice that adds roughly £843 a year on a £28,000 clerk and about £1,227 on a £60,000 finance manager, before pension and other costs. Across a transactional team it is a meaningful increase for no extra capacity. What will our auditor think about an offshore team? Auditors are familiar with offshore and shared service finance functions. They will want to see where processing happens, who has system access, how approvals are evidenced and that the audit trail is complete. Prepare a process map and access matrix in advance. Larger clients and lenders may also ask about information security certification such as ISO 27001. Can an offshore team run our payroll? They can prepare it: collating data, checking changes, producing the run for approval. Approval and submission stay onshore. Note that payroll data is personal data, so offshore access is a restricted transfer under UK GDPR requiring adequacy, an appropriate safeguard or an exception. Romania is covered by UK adequacy; South Africa and India need an International Data Transfer Agreement and a transfer risk assessment. Which finance process should move offshore first? Accounts payable. It is high volume, rules-based, easy to document, has an unambiguous quality measure, and is usually the work your qualified staff least want to do. Prove it over a quarter, then extend to reconciliations, sales ledger and month-end preparation.
Two consultants reviewing a document together at a desk in a bright modern professional services office
Blog

Offshore Teams for Professional Services and Consulting Firms

Professional services firms sell hours, so every hour a qualified fee earner spends on work nobody would pay for is money that never arrives. An offshore support layer changes that arithmetic: it moves the research, production and administration underneath your fee earners to people employed to do it well, so the expensive hours go back to work clients will actually pay for. This applies across the sector, in management consultancies, engineering and architectural practices, surveying firms, research and insight agencies, and legal and accountancy practices. The business model is the same in each: revenue is a function of how many chargeable hours your people deliver and what proportion of those hours you actually bill and collect. Key takeaway In a people business the offshore case is not primarily about cost per head. It is about leverage. Adding capable support beneath your fee earners raises the proportion of senior time spent on billable client work, and in a firm that sells hours that is the single most powerful lever you have. Why the economics are tightening Three pressures compound in a professional services firm, and they all point the same way. Salaries have risen faster than rates. Firms have absorbed several years of significant pay pressure for qualified staff, particularly at the two to six year post-qualification mark where the competition for talent is fiercest. Passing all of that through to clients has not generally been possible, so margin per fee earner has been squeezed from both ends. Non-billable work has grown. The administrative load around delivery has increased: more compliance, more reporting, more procurement and bid processes, more data handling. Much of that lands on the same people who are meant to be delivering chargeable work, because there is nobody else to absorb it. Leverage has thinned. In the classic professional services model, senior people supervise a base of juniors who do the groundwork. Where that base has been cut or never built, senior people end up doing their own document production, their own data gathering and their own scheduling. A partner formatting a report is the most expensive administrator in the building. The reason this matters so much is compounding. Recovering even a few hours a week per fee earner, at chargeable rates, across a team of twenty, is a material revenue figure by year end. You do not need a dramatic productivity claim for the arithmetic to work. There is a useful parallel in how the legal sector is currently thinking about AI, and it carries a warning. PwC's Law Firm Survey 2025 found that firms predict an average of 16 per cent of hours saved from AI adoption, up from an expectation of around 11 per cent the previous year. Capacity, in other words, is genuinely being released. What happens to that capacity is where it gets interesting, and where firm size matters. PwC reports that over half of Top 50 firms are now seeing financial and productivity benefits from AI tools. The picture is markedly weaker further down the market, where firms are more concerned about price erosion than they are confident of capturing gains. That split is the real lesson, and it applies just as directly to offshore support as it does to AI. Releasing fee earner hours achieves nothing on its own. The hours have to be deliberately redeployed into billable work, or the capacity is simply absorbed and the investment shows up as cost without return. Larger firms tend to capture it because they plan for it. Decide in advance what your fee earners will do with the time, and hold them to it. What moves and what must not The test is not seniority or difficulty. It is whether the task requires the client relationship or professional judgement that the client is specifically paying your name for. Moves well to an embedded team Stays with your fee earners Desk research, market scans, competitor and precedent gathering Advising the client on what the research means Data gathering, cleaning and structuring Interpreting the data and standing behind the conclusion Financial model building and scenario runs to a defined spec Setting the assumptions and signing off the model Report and deck production, formatting, version control The narrative, the recommendation, the delivery Bid and proposal assembly, CV and credential libraries Win strategy and the client conversation CAD production, drawing sets, technical documentation Design intent and professional sign-off Transcription, coding and tabulation of qualitative research Analysis and client debrief Finance, billing support, HR and marketing back office Client billing conversations and relationship management The pattern is consistent: the input work and the production work move, the judgement and the relationship stay. Clients are buying your firm's opinion and accountability, not the hours spent assembling the inputs to it. Confidentiality, consent and professional obligations This is the section that determines whether the idea survives contact with your risk partner, and it deserves proper attention rather than reassurance. Check your client contracts first. Many professional services engagements, particularly with larger corporates and anything in the public sector, contain provisions on where work may be performed, subcontracting, and who may access client information. Some require notification, some require consent, some are silent. Establish your position across your major clients before you design the team, not afterwards. Professional and regulatory obligations continue to apply. Confidentiality duties under your professional body's rules do not change because part of the work happens elsewhere. The obligation remains yours, and the practical answer is that offshore team members are bound by the same confidentiality terms, supervision and file-handling discipline as your UK staff, because they are your team rather than a supplier's. Data protection is a concrete requirement, not a formality. Where client work contains personal data, giving access to a team outside the UK is a restricted transfer under UK GDPR. The ICO requires every restricted transfer to be covered by adequacy regulations, appropriate safeguards or an exception. Romania, in the EEA, is covered by UK adequacy. South Africa and India are not, and require a safeguard such as the International Data Transfer Agreement together with a transfer risk assessment. For a firm handling client personal data at volume, this may itself influence which hub you choose. Expect client security due diligence. Corporate clients increasingly ask where their data is processed and by whom, and ISO 27001 certification and a clear answer on access controls will be asked for. An office-based team with managed devices, controlled network access and local supervision is a far easier answer to give than distributed remote contractors. Making it work in a fee earning culture The commonest failure is not technical. It is that fee earners keep doing the work themselves because delegating feels slower in the moment. Start with one team and one work type rather than offering general support to everyone, so the offshore team develops genuine depth and the briefing patterns become established. Invest properly in briefing: a well-specified request produces usable output first time, and the firms that struggle are usually the ones that brief in half sentences and then conclude the model does not work. Build the review step in explicitly, at least at first, because trust is earned through delivery. And measure the right thing: not offshore utilisation, but whether your fee earners' billable hours went up. Give it two or three months before judging it. The first weeks involve teaching, and the return arrives once the team knows your templates, your clients and your standards, which is exactly the knowledge that never accumulates when you use temporary resource. Where Potentiam fits Potentiam builds embedded teams for UK professional services firms across South Africa, Romania, India and Brazil. We provide the office, the recruitment, the local management and the in-country HR; you direct the work and own the client relationship, the judgement and the professional accountability, as you must. Our own founders scaled a professional services business to more than 300 people with the majority of the team offshore before its acquisition by Accenture, so the model is one we have run rather than only advised on. If you are weighing this against other routes, we compare the alternatives in our guides to recruitment agencies, traditional outsourcing and freelance marketplaces, and the embedded offshore team model explains how the approach works end to end. Frequently asked questions Can professional services firms offshore client work? Support and production work, generally yes; advisory work and professional sign-off, no. Research, data preparation, model building, document and drawing production and bid assembly all move well. The judgement, the recommendation and the accountability stay with your qualified people, because that is what the client is buying. Check your client contracts and professional body rules before you start, as some engagements restrict where work may be performed. Do we need client consent to use an offshore team? It depends on your engagement terms. Many professional services contracts, particularly with large corporates and public sector bodies, address subcontracting, location of work or access to confidential information. Review your major client agreements first. Separately, if the work involves personal data, UK GDPR restricted transfer rules apply regardless of what the contract says. How does an offshore support team improve profitability? Through leverage rather than headcount cost alone. Moving research, production and administration off your fee earners raises the share of their time spent on chargeable work. In a firm that bills by the hour, a few recovered hours per fee earner per week compounds quickly across a team, and the support role costs a fraction of the fee earner whose time it releases. Which hub suits a professional services firm? South Africa aligns almost completely with UK working hours and English is widely a first language, which suits collaborative support work with same-day turnaround. Romania suits firms serving EU clients or handling significant volumes of personal data, because it is covered by UK adequacy. India offers the deepest technical and analytical talent pool and the strongest cost position. Many firms combine hubs. Is there hard data on how much fee earner time is non-billable? Less than you would expect for the UK specifically. Robust, publicly available UK figures on the non-billable split are sparse, and much of what circulates comes from vendors or from other jurisdictions and does not transfer reliably. Rather than lean on a borrowed number, measure your own: most time recording systems can report the chargeable and non-chargeable split by grade, and your own figure is the only one worth building a business case on. How long before we see a return? Expect two to three months. The early weeks involve briefing, template learning and review, and the return arrives once the team knows your standards, clients and formats well enough to work with light supervision. Judge it on your fee earners' billable hours rather than on offshore activity levels.

More articles

Two IT engineers reviewing a monitoring dashboard together in a managed services operations room
Blog

Offshore Microsoft 365 and Managed Services Teams for UK MSPs

An offshore Microsoft 365 team for an MSP is a dedicated, office-based group of administrators employed to work only on your clients, inside your tooling and your processes, under your service delivery management. It is not a second provider you subcontract to. The distinction matters commercially, because subcontracting adds a margin and a management layer, while an embedded team simply changes where your own capacity sits. For UK MSPs the appeal is straightforward: engineer salaries have
A UK founder at his desk comparing options on a printed document, laptop open, London skyline behind
Blog

Freelance Marketplaces or an Embedded Offshore Team? Choosing for Ongoing Work

Freelance marketplaces and an embedded offshore team solve different problems, and most of the pain companies experience with freelancers comes from using one to do the job of the other. A freelancer is the right answer for a defined piece of work with an end date. For a role you need filled every working day for the next year, the platform model works against you: you pay a premium for flexibility you are not using, the knowledge builds up in someone who can leave at a week's notice, and the legal position is more complicated than most buyers realise.
An IT service delivery manager and a colleague reviewing a service desk transition plan on a tablet, with an open-plan support floor behind them
Blog

Migrating an Outsourced Service Desk to an Embedded Offshore Team

Migrating an outsourced IT service desk to an embedded offshore team means ending or reducing a third-party managed service contract and rebuilding the same capability as a dedicated, office-based team that you direct yourself, usually in a lower-cost location. Done properly it is a phased transition over three to six months, not a switch you flip. The two things that determine whether it works are the baseline you capture before you start, and how seriously you treat knowledge transfer.
A UK operations director reviewing a service contract and cost figures in a modern boardroom
Blog

BPO or Embedded Offshore Team? How to Choose for Your Process

Business process outsourcing is the alternative most mid-market companies weigh up first, and for good reason. For high-volume, standardised work it is genuinely effective, and the industry is enormous precisely because it solves a real problem. Where it tends to disappoint is when a company hands over a process that is still evolving, or one that turns out to be closer to the core of the business than it looked on the day the contract was signed. This guide sets out what BPO actually is,
A business leader at a window considering a strategic location decision, city skyline beyond
Blog

Offshoring vs Nearshoring vs Onshoring: A Location Guide for UK Companies

Most location decisions go wrong in the first conversation, because the room is arguing about two different questions at once. Outsourcing is a question about who does the work. Offshoring, nearshoring and onshoring are questions about where it happens. They are independent choices, and treating them as one produces false trade-offs that narrow the options before anyone has looked at the facts. This guide separates the two, defines each location model precisely,
A business leader reviewing international employment and hiring options in a modern UK office
Blog

What Is an Employer of Record? Costs, Limits and When to Use One

If you want to employ someone in a country where you have no legal entity, an Employer of Record is often the fastest compliant route. It is a genuinely useful model, and for one or two hires in a new market it is usually the right one. What it is not is a way to build a team. Understanding that distinction before you commit saves a great deal of money and rework later. This guide explains what an EOR actually does, what it costs, where it works well, and where its economics and structure