--- title: Dedicated Team vs Staff Augmentation | UK Decision Guide description: "Staff augmentation, dedicated development teams and embedded teams compared for UK firms: control, knowledge retention, IR35, IP and how to decide." image: https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/blog/images/dedicated-team-vs-staff-aug-hero.webp --- [![footer-logo](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/footer-logo.svg "footer-logo")](https://potentiam.co.uk) - [Solutions](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions) [![Technology icon](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/Technology%20icon.svg) Technology Scale your team with a dedicated advisor who aligns architecture and performance 
to your goals.](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/technology) [![Finance and Accounting icon](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/Finance%20and%20Accounting%20icon.svg) Finance and Accounting Finance specialists build offshore teams using the right processes and skills to strengthen accounting and deliver results.](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/finance-accounting) [![Marketing and Creative](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/Marketing%20and%20Creative.svg) Marketing & Creative Marketing advisors build offshore teams that close capability gaps and integrate seamlessly with local operations.](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/marketing-and-design) [![Data Analytics icon](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/Data%20Analytics%20icon.svg) Data Analytics Analytics experts design scalable offshore data teams that deliver actionable insights and business value.](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/data-analytics) [![Sales and Customer Success icon](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/Sales%20and%20Customer%20Success%20icon.svg) Sales & Customer Success Specialists build offshore sales and customer success teams aligned for growth and strong client relationships.](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/sales-customer-service-solutions) [![Engineering and Construction icon](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/Engineering%20and%20Construction%20icon.svg) Energy Consulting Solutions Scale engineering and construction projects with offshore teams that improve control, efficiency, and on-time delivery.](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/energy-consulting) - Locations [![menu-icon](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/menu-icon.svg) Cape Town, South Africa English-speaking teams with seamless UK collaboration](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/south-africa) [![menu-icon](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/menu-icon.svg) Bengaluru, India Technology and data capability with EU and UK time-zone overlap](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/india) [![menu-icon](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/menu-icon.svg) Iași, Romania Multilingual EU talent aligned with European markets](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/romania) [![menu-icon](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/menu-icon.svg) Johannesburg, South Africa English-speaking talent with UK time-zone alignment](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/johannesburg) [![menu-icon](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Images/Icons/menu-icon.svg) São Paulo, Brazil Latin American talent with US and EU time-zone overlap](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/brazil) - [Careers](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/careers) - [About](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/about-us) - Resources [![Blog](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/Blog.svg) Blogs Explore strategies and insights on building high-performing offshore teams, scaling global operations, and unlocking performance growth.](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk) [![case guides](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/case%20guides.svg) Guides Explore essential offshoring strategies for IT managed service providers with our comprehensive guides tailored for COOs and CEOs.](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/guides) [![webinar](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/webinar.svg) Webinars Watch Potentiam’s webinars to discover how offshore teams can accelerate growth, cut costs, and boost performance.](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/webinars) [![case studies](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/case%20studies.svg) Case Studies Explore case studies showcasing how companies in various industries are enhancing efficiency and growth through innovative strategies and specialised services.](https://casestudies.potentiam.co.uk) - [Contact](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/contact-us) - [Book a meeting](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/contact-us) Back to Articles ![An engineering lead talking with three software engineers at their workstations during an informal stand-up](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/blog/images/dedicated-team-vs-staff-aug-hero.webp) Scroll Back to Articles [Blog](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/tag/blog) | 04 September 2026 # Dedicated Development Team vs Staff Augmentation: Which Model Fits [Potentiam](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/author/potentiam) Staff augmentation means renting individual engineers who slot into your existing team and work under your management, billed by the hour or the day. A dedicated development team means a supplier assembles a self-contained unit, usually with its own team lead and project manager, and delivers against your requirements. They are genuinely different things, and the choice between them determines who carries delivery risk, where knowledge accumulates, and what you are left with when the engagement ends. There is a third option that most comparisons leave out, which is to have a partner employ a team dedicated to you in a lower-cost location while you direct the people exactly as you would your own staff. That is the embedded model, and where it fits is set out below. Key takeaway The question that matters more than cost per developer is who you want holding the knowledge of your codebase in two years' time. Unless you build in documentation and handover, staff augmentation tends to leave it with individuals who move on, and a dedicated team tends to leave it with your supplier. An embedded team is a permanent part of your function, designed to keep that knowledge with you. A word on the numbers you will find Comparisons of these two models often quote savings percentages and break-even points without saying where they come from. Treat any figure you cannot trace as indicative, and model your own before committing: the rate you are actually quoted, your management time at a realistic hourly cost, and the replacement and re-onboarding costs you have genuinely incurred. ## How each model actually works **Staff augmentation.** You identify a skills gap, a supplier provides engineers to fill it, and those engineers join your stand-ups, your sprint board and your review process. You set priorities, you manage them day to day, and you carry delivery accountability. The supplier's role is essentially sourcing and employment. People can be added or removed as the gap changes, within the contract's notice terms. **Dedicated development team.** The supplier assembles a unit, commonly a team lead, several engineers and a QA function, and that unit works on your product with the supplier managing it internally. You set the product direction; they organise how the work gets done. Engagements are built around a product or project, so they tend to run longer, and there is an onboarding period before the team becomes cohesive. The practical difference is who manages the work. With augmentation you manage the engineers day to day, which gives you control and costs you time. With a dedicated team the supplier's lead manages them, which saves your time but gives you less visibility unless the contract builds in access and reporting. You pay for the management layer either way, whether in your own time or in the supplier's margin. ## Where staff augmentation is the right answer You have a strong engineering function and a specific, temporary gap: a migration, a compliance deadline, a specialism you need for one quarter. Your management capacity is not the constraint, so absorbing another few people into an existing structure costs you little. Or the work is genuinely finite, with a date on which it stops. In those cases paying for flexibility is rational, because you are actually using it. It stops being the right answer when the temporary gap turns out to be permanent, which, in our experience, is a common way companies end up overpaying. If you keep renewing the same augmented engineers, you are paying a contractor rate for what has become a permanent team. ![An engineering manager briefing a colleague at a wall-mounted planning board](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/engineering-management-overhead-body.webp?width=1200&height=675&name=engineering-management-overhead-body.webp) ## Where the model breaks down **Knowledge leaves with people.** When an engineer moves on, they take whatever context about your architecture, your quirks and your decisions has not been written down, and every replacement needs onboarding you pay for twice: once in fees and once in your senior engineers' time. **Management overhead is real but invisible.** The hourly rate is easy to compare; the hours your engineering lead spends briefing, reviewing and coordinating are not on any invoice. In a small engineering function that time is the scarcest thing you have. **With a dedicated team, the process knowledge tends to accumulate at the supplier**, unless the contract requires documentation and a handover plan. That is comfortable while the relationship works. It becomes the whole problem when you want to change supplier or bring the work in house, which is the same dynamic we describe in our guide to [BPO versus an embedded offshore team](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/bpo-vs-embedded-offshore-team). Two legal points worth checking early **Employment status.** Where an engineer works through their own limited company and the relationship looks like employment, [HMRC's off-payroll working rules](https://www.gov.uk/guidance/understanding-off-payroll-working-ir35) can apply. For medium and large clients it is the client's responsibility to determine status and issue a status determination statement, and where the worker is deemed employed the deemed employer must account for income tax, employee and employer National Insurance and any Apprenticeship Levy. Long-running, full-time augmentation is worth reviewing against those rules, so assess the contract and the actual working practices. For an engineer who lives and works entirely outside the UK, the main exposure is usually misclassification under local law instead. **Data protection.** If engineers employed by a separate organisation outside the UK can access systems containing personal data, that is a restricted transfer under UK GDPR even when nothing is exported, and the [ICO](https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/international-transfers/a-brief-guide-to-international-transfers/) requires it to be covered by adequacy regulations, appropriate safeguards or an exception. Romania is covered by UK adequacy as an EEA member state; South Africa, India and Brazil are not, so those ordinarily need an appropriate safeguard such as the International Data Transfer Agreement or the Addendum, plus a transfer risk assessment. Take advice on your own data flows. ## Intellectual property In both models the intention is normally that everything produced belongs to you, but intention is not assignment. Check that your contract assigns IP rather than licensing it, that assignment is not conditional on something that might not happen cleanly, and that the chain of ownership is complete, running from each engineer to their employer or intermediary and on to you, rather than stopping at the supplier. Where people work through their own companies or through a chain of intermediaries, check every link, because a gap anywhere in the chain is a gap in your ownership. Under UK law, copyright in work an employee creates in the course of employment ordinarily belongs to the employer ([Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 11](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/11)), which makes the position simpler. For people employed abroad, check the local rules and make sure the employer's rights pass on to you. This is worth a conversation with your own advisers rather than an assumption from an article. ## Three models, side by side | | Staff augmentation | Dedicated team | Embedded team | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **Who directs the work** | You | Supplier's lead | You | | **Who employs** | Supplier or intermediary | Supplier | Partner, dedicated to you | | **Where knowledge tends to sit** | With individuals | With the supplier | With your business | | **What you manage** | The engineers, day to day | Requirements and the supplier relationship | The work; the partner handles employment, HR and the office | | **Intended length** | Until the gap closes | The life of the product or project | As long as you need the capability | | **Best when** | A real gap with an end date | You want delivery handled | The capability is permanent | These describe how each model is designed to work; contract terms and documentation can shift any of them. ![Two software engineers reviewing code together at one workstation](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/engineering-pair-review-body.webp?width=1200&height=675&name=engineering-pair-review-body.webp) ## How to decide One question settles most of it: is this capability temporary or permanent? If the work genuinely stops on a known date, augmentation is sensible and you should take the flexibility you are paying for. If you cannot name the date it stops, you are building a permanent function, and the model should reflect that. The second question is who you want to own the knowledge. If your codebase is the business, having its institutional memory sit inside a supplier is a strategic exposure, however good the relationship is today. And rather than borrowing anyone's break-even figures, build your own. Take a real role, put in the rate you are actually quoted, add your management time at a realistic hourly cost, add the replacement and re-onboarding cost you have genuinely incurred over the past two years, and compare it against the full employed cost in the location you are considering, including any partner's charge. That number will be more useful than any published comparison. ## Where Potentiam fits We build embedded engineering teams for UK and European companies across five hubs in South Africa, Romania, India and Brazil. The people are recruited to your specification and work only for you, in your repositories, your stand-ups and your review process. You stay in control of the work. Your managers direct priorities, workflows and technical delivery, while we provide the local management and infrastructure that support the team day to day. Which hub suits which engineering role is set out in our guide to the [best offshore location for a technology or MSP team](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/best-offshore-location-technology-msp-team). Unlike augmented engineers, the people are recruited and employed as a permanent part of your function, so knowledge can build up in your team. Unlike a dedicated-team supplier, we do not direct the work or sit between you and your engineers. If you are weighing this against other routes, we compare them in our guides to [recruitment agencies](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/recruitment-agency-vs-embedded-offshore-team), [freelance marketplaces](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/freelance-marketplaces-vs-embedded-offshore-team), [Employer of Record platforms](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/what-is-an-employer-of-record), [EOR versus an embedded team](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/employer-of-record-vs-embedded-offshore-team) and [traditional outsourcing](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/bpo-vs-embedded-offshore-team), and the [embedded offshore team model](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/embedded-offshore-team-model) explains how the approach works end to end. ## Frequently asked questions **What is the difference between staff augmentation and a dedicated development team?** With staff augmentation you rent individual engineers who join your existing team and work under your management, and you keep delivery accountability. With a dedicated development team, a supplier assembles a self-contained unit with its own lead and manages the work internally, delivering against your requirements. The trade is control against management effort: managing augmented engineers yourself gives you more control but takes more of your time, and a supplier-managed team saves time but gives you less control. **Which is cheaper?** It depends on duration, and you should be sceptical of anyone who answers confidently. Augmentation can look cheaper at the start because you pay only for time used. Over a long engagement, any premium you pay for flexibility, your management time and the cost of replacing people who move on all add up. Where the crossover sits depends on your rates, your management time and your turnover, so model it with your own numbers. **Does IR35 apply to augmented developers?** It can. HMRC's off-payroll working rules apply where a worker provides services through their own intermediary and the relationship resembles employment. For medium and large clients, determining status and issuing a status determination statement is the client's responsibility, and where the worker is deemed employed the deemed employer accounts for income tax and National Insurance. Assess long-running full-time arrangements against the contract and the actual working practices, and take advice. **Who owns the code?** Normally you should, but check the contract assigns IP rather than licensing it, that assignment is unconditional, and that the chain of ownership runs from the individual engineers, through any intermediary companies, to you. Under UK law, copyright in work an employee creates in the course of employment ordinarily belongs to the employer, which is a simpler position; for people employed abroad, check the local rules and the onward assignment to you. Take your own legal advice on the specifics. **Can offshore engineers access our systems and data?** Yes, with the right safeguards. Giving people employed by a separate organisation outside the UK access to systems holding personal data is a restricted transfer under UK GDPR, which must be covered by adequacy regulations, appropriate safeguards or an exception. Romania is covered by UK adequacy; South Africa, India and Brazil ordinarily require an appropriate safeguard such as the International Data Transfer Agreement together with a transfer risk assessment. This applies whichever engagement model you choose. Scroll ## Ready to scale your team? Discover how our proven model builds teams that drive performance, reduce costs, and multiply growth. [Book a Demo](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/contact-us) ### Related case studies [![A UK founder at his desk comparing options on a printed document, laptop open, London skyline behind](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/freelance-vs-embedded-decision-hero.webp?length=750&name=freelance-vs-embedded-decision-hero.webp)](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/freelance-marketplaces-vs-embedded-offshore-team) [Blog](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/tag/blog) #### [Freelance Marketplaces or an Embedded Offshore Team? Choosing for Ongoing Work](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/freelance-marketplaces-vs-embedded-offshore-team) [![A UK operations director comparing an employment contract with a team structure plan in a modern office](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/eor1-hero-v2-20260904-231536.webp?length=750&name=eor1-hero-v2-20260904-231536.webp)](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/employer-of-record-vs-embedded-offshore-team) [Blog](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/tag/blog) #### [EOR or Embedded Offshore Team? Which One You Need](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/employer-of-record-vs-embedded-offshore-team) [![A UK business leader and team lead reviewing team growth and hiring options in a modern office](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/positioning-hiring-options-hero.webp?length=750&name=positioning-hiring-options-hero.webp)](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/recruitment-agency-vs-embedded-offshore-team) [Blog](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/tag/blog) #### [Recruitment Agency, Staffing Firm or Embedded Offshore Team: Which Do You Need?](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/recruitment-agency-vs-embedded-offshore-team) [![An offshore team leader guiding two colleagues at their desks in a bright, well-run office](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/managed-services-offshore-team-office-2026-09.webp?length=750&name=managed-services-offshore-team-office-2026-09.webp)](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/benefits-of-using-managed-services-for-building-an-offshore-team) [Featured](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/tag/featured) #### [Managed Services vs BPO vs EOR: Which Model Delivers the Best Offshore Team?](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/benefits-of-using-managed-services-for-building-an-offshore-team) [![An IT service delivery manager and a colleague reviewing a service desk transition plan on a tablet, with an open-plan support floor behind them](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/service-desk-migration-planning-hero.webp?length=750&name=service-desk-migration-planning-hero.webp)](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/migrating-outsourced-service-desk-offshore-team) [Blog](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/tag/blog) #### [Migrating an Outsourced Service Desk to an Embedded Offshore Team](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/migrating-outsourced-service-desk-offshore-team) [![A UK operations director reviewing a service contract and cost figures in a modern boardroom](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/bpo-contract-review-hero.webp?length=750&name=bpo-contract-review-hero.webp)](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/bpo-vs-embedded-offshore-team) [Blog](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/tag/blog) #### [BPO or Embedded Offshore Team? How to Choose for Your Process](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/bpo-vs-embedded-offshore-team) [![Diverse software development team collaborating in a modern Cape Town tech office with Table Mountain visible through the windows](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/uk-sa-hero-v2-hero-1.webp?length=750&name=uk-sa-hero-v2-hero-1.webp)](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/how-an-integrated-uk-and-south-african-team-built-a-global-community-platform-for-alumni) [IT & Software](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/tag/it-software) #### [How Aluminati Built an Integrated UK and Cape Town Development Team](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/how-an-integrated-uk-and-south-african-team-built-a-global-community-platform-for-alumni) [![Two consultants reviewing a document together at a desk in a bright modern professional services office](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/professional-services-offshore-hero.webp?length=750&name=professional-services-offshore-hero.webp)](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/offshore-teams-professional-services-consulting) [Blog](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/tag/blog) #### [Offshore Teams for Professional Services and Consulting Firms](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/offshore-teams-professional-services-consulting) [![A business manager and an integrated offshore team collaborating over a shared project dashboard in a modern office, illustrating the embedded offshore team model](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hs-fs/hubfs/blog/images/embedded-offshore-team-model-hero-20260714-181621.webp?length=750&name=embedded-offshore-team-model-hero-20260714-181621.webp)](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/embedded-offshore-team-model) [Blog](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/tag/blog) #### [The Embedded Offshore Team Model: What It Is and How It Works](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/embedded-offshore-team-model) [![footer-logo](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/footer-logo.svg)](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/) We strategically build offshore teams that integrate seamlessly into your business. ##### Solutions - [Technology](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/technology) - [Finance & Accounting](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/finance-accounting) - [Marketing & Design](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/marketing-and-design) - [Data Analytics](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/data-analytics) - [Sales & Customer Success](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/sales-customer-service-solutions) - [Energy Consulting](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/solutions/energy-consulting) ##### Locations - [Cape Town](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/south-africa) - [Johannesburg](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/johannesburg) - [Bangalore](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/india) - [Iași](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/romania) - [São Paulo](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/locations/brazil) ##### Quick links - [About us](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/about-us) - [Careers](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/careers) - [Contact us](https://www.potentiam.co.uk/contact-us) © 2026 Potentiam. All rights reserved. [Privacy Policy](https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/privacy) ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@id" : "https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/dedicated-development-team-vs-staff-augmentation#article", "@type" : "Article", "author" : { "@id" : "https://www.potentiam.co.uk/#organization" }, "dateModified" : "2026-09-29", "datePublished" : "2026-09-04T15:27:16Z", "description" : "Staff augmentation, dedicated development teams and embedded teams compared for UK firms: control, knowledge retention, IR35, IP and how to decide.", "headline" : "Dedicated Development Team vs Staff Augmentation: Which Model Fits", "image" : "https://5804539.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/5804539/blog/images/dedicated-team-vs-staff-aug-hero.webp", "keywords" : [ "dedicated development team", "staff augmentation", "staff augmentation vs dedicated team", "IR35 developers", "embedded engineering team" ], "mainEntityOfPage" : { "@id" : "https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/dedicated-development-team-vs-staff-augmentation" }, "publisher" : { "@id" : "https://www.potentiam.co.uk/#organization" }, "wordCount" : 2008 } ``` ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@id" : "https://www.potentiam.co.uk/#organization", "@type" : "Organization", "address" : { "@type" : "PostalAddress", "addressCountry" : "GB" }, "description" : "Potentiam is a London-based strategic offshoring consultancy that helps mid-sized companies build high-performing, embedded offshore teams across five hubs in South Africa, Romania, India and Brazil: Cape Town, Johannesburg, Iași, Bengaluru and São Paulo.", "logo" : { "@type" : "ImageObject", "url" : "https://www.potentiam.co.uk/hubfs/logo.svg" }, "name" : "Potentiam Ltd", "sameAs" : [ "https://www.linkedin.com/company/potentiam-ltd" ], "url" : "https://www.potentiam.co.uk" } ``` ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@id" : "https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/dedicated-development-team-vs-staff-augmentation#breadcrumb", "@type" : "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement" : [ { "@type" : "ListItem", "item" : "https://www.potentiam.co.uk", "name" : "Home", "position" : 1 }, { "@type" : "ListItem", "item" : "https://blog.potentiam.co.uk", "name" : "Blog", "position" : 2 }, { "@type" : "ListItem", "name" : "Dedicated Development Team vs Staff Augmentation", "position" : 3 } ] } ``` ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@id" : "https://blog.potentiam.co.uk/dedicated-development-team-vs-staff-augmentation#faq", "@type" : "FAQPage", "mainEntity" : [ { "@type" : "Question", "acceptedAnswer" : { "@type" : "Answer", "text" : "With staff augmentation you rent individual engineers who join your existing team and work under your management, and you keep delivery accountability. With a dedicated development team, a supplier assembles a self-contained unit with its own lead and manages the work internally, delivering against your requirements. The trade is control against management effort: managing augmented engineers yourself gives you more control but takes more of your time, and a supplier-managed team saves time but gives you less control." }, "name" : "What is the difference between staff augmentation and a dedicated development team?" }, { "@type" : "Question", "acceptedAnswer" : { "@type" : "Answer", "text" : "It depends on duration, and you should be sceptical of anyone who answers confidently. Augmentation can look cheaper at the start because you pay only for time used. Over a long engagement, any premium you pay for flexibility, your management time and the cost of replacing people who move on all add up. Where the crossover sits depends on your rates, your management time and your turnover, so model it with your own numbers." }, "name" : "Which is cheaper?" }, { "@type" : "Question", "acceptedAnswer" : { "@type" : "Answer", "text" : "It can. HMRC's off-payroll working rules apply where a worker provides services through their own intermediary and the relationship resembles employment. For medium and large clients, determining status and issuing a status determination statement is the client's responsibility, and where the worker is deemed employed the deemed employer accounts for income tax and National Insurance. Assess long-running full-time arrangements against the contract and the actual working practices, and take advice." }, "name" : "Does IR35 apply to augmented developers?" }, { "@type" : "Question", "acceptedAnswer" : { "@type" : "Answer", "text" : "Normally you should, but check the contract assigns IP rather than licensing it, that assignment is unconditional, and that the chain of ownership runs from the individual engineers, through any intermediary companies, to you. Under UK law, copyright in work an employee creates in the course of employment ordinarily belongs to the employer, which is a simpler position; for people employed abroad, check the local rules and the onward assignment to you. Take your own legal advice on the specifics." }, "name" : "Who owns the code?" }, { "@type" : "Question", "acceptedAnswer" : { "@type" : "Answer", "text" : "Yes, with the right safeguards. Giving people employed by a separate organisation outside the UK access to systems holding personal data is a restricted transfer under UK GDPR, which must be covered by adequacy regulations, appropriate safeguards or an exception. Romania is covered by UK adequacy; South Africa, India and Brazil ordinarily require an appropriate safeguard such as the International Data Transfer Agreement together with a transfer risk assessment. This applies whichever engagement model you choose." }, "name" : "Can offshore engineers access our systems and data?" } ] } ```